Alexander Eliot
I like how Eliot has not simply described what is in the painting, what is there to be viewed, but rather he has taken us outside the painting and created a sense of perhaps who is viewing the scene (rather than simply viewing the painting).
Oftentimes with art we look at we see and we examine it. We move around it, we peer more closely, we hold it if we can, we turn pages if allowed. We focus so very much on the the object. We sometimes step away from pure observation and consider the why? We ponder motivation and drive, we read the artist statement or descriptor and ask what was the catalyst for this work?
Far less frequently do I feel as if I completely step out and pretend I am an unobserved participant. Of course a painter paints from a perspective and you feel you can see what they were looking at say, as they painted; but I like the suggestion here that one is an invisible participant in the scene - not simply viewing it from the point at which the painter stood.
Rather, feeling as if you are a passerby looking into that well-lit room and wondering about the individuals as you pass on by.
Nighthawks by Edward Hopper.
Edward Hopper has always been one of my favorite artists and this painting is so thought provoking. Thank you for yet another perspective on it.
ReplyDeleteI agree - this painting deserves lots of attention and pondering; so many things to imagine. Go well
Delete